AI Text Detector
Detect AI-generated text with rule-based heuristics
Free AI text detector — rule-based, private, unlimited
Toololis AI Text Detector analyzes whether text was likely written by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or other AI models. We use the same statistical heuristics that power paid services like GPTZero and Copyleaks — but free, unlimited, and entirely in your browser.
How to use this tool
- 1
Paste the text
Drop 200+ words for reliable analysis. Shorter samples give less accurate results — that's a fundamental limit of heuristic detection.
- 2
Wait for analysis
The analyzer runs 5 heuristics in parallel — all in your browser, in milliseconds.
- 3
Read the breakdown
Overall AI-likelihood score plus individual metric breakdowns. Review which signals triggered.
The 5 heuristics we measure
- 1. Perplexity proxy
- Measures word predictability. AI tends to use common, predictable words more often than humans. We compute the ratio of rare words (not in top 500) to total words.
- 2. Burstiness
- Measures sentence-length variance. Humans mix short punchy sentences with long flowing ones. AI produces more uniform lengths. Higher variance = more human-like.
- 3. Vocabulary diversity (TTR)
- Type-Token Ratio = unique words / total words. AI has moderate TTR; humans vary widely. Too high or too low both suggest machine-generation.
- 4. Repetition score
- Counts how often 3-word sequences repeat. AI tends to reuse phrases. Humans vary their phrasing.
- 5. AI-tell phrases
- Common AI linguistic patterns: "furthermore", "it is important to note", "in conclusion", "delve into", "moreover", "a testament to", "navigate the complexities".
⚠️ Important: No AI detector is 100% accurate
False positives are common. Formal writing (academic, legal, technical) often flags as AI because humans also use structured prose. Non-native English speakers are disproportionately flagged because their prose tends toward common words. Short texts (under 200 words) have high error rates regardless of detector.
Never use AI detection as proof of misconduct. Use it as a conversation starter, never a verdict.
What this tool is good for
- Quickly sanity-checking suspected AI-written content
- Self-reviewing your own writing for AI-like patterns if you used AI-assistance
- Understanding the heuristic signals AI detectors use
- Comparing with paid tools before paying for subscriptions
What this tool is NOT good for
- Accusing students of academic misconduct
- Rejecting job applications / submissions
- Any high-stakes decision
- Detecting paraphrased / hybrid human-AI content